National, State, and Local Politics Affecting Virginia Beach

I like my tea full bodied: The Health Care Debate

By Joel McDonald • Aug 18th, 2009 • Category: Blog, Related News

Health ReformI haven’t written much on my thoughts concerning the current debate on health care in our nation, but I have been following the mainstream media and the blogosphere, in addition to reviewing some of the bills being considered by congress, to get a grip on what’s happening with the debate and what direction we’ll soon be heading in regard to how we all will access health care. Doing so hasn’t been easy, and this difficulty is due to the fact that nobody seems to know what’s going on, or where we are heading.

What I do know is that health care is not a partisan, conservative vs. liberal, issue. Virtually everyone agrees that there are huge inequalities in our health system and that millions of people are at the whim of profiteering insurance companies who are just as likely to reject claims of people with serious illness as they are to accept the charges and then drop their coverage. When a person’s access to health care is determined by a corporation who’s focus is not the health of their customers, but the health of their own bottom line, grave injustices occur and people go without adequate health care and sometimes lose their lives as a result.

Sadly, but like so many things in life, we are unable to comprehend the difficult position which people are placed in when they are unable to acquire or lose their health insurance when they need access to health care. For those who push ahead and enter into massive amounts of debt in order to be treated for serious illnesses, their lives are often left in ruin as they lose what they’ve worked for their entire lives; the insurance which was supposed to protect these people all too often fails. The individual loses everything, while the insurance company profits from premiums paid while their former customer was healthy.

This is the reality of the situation, and as health care costs continue to rise at a breakneck pace, this will be the reality that more and more people find themselves in. It could be you, and it could be me who find ourselves facing a diagnosis that is going to wreck our lives even if that illness is overcome.

We need health care reform, and we need it soon. The Obama Administration is making this reform a top priority while considering such reform as a large piece to their economic puzzle. President Obama has set forth guiding principles for possible health care legislation. Here they are:

  • Reduce long-term growth of health care costs for businesses and government
  • Protect families from bankruptcy or debt because of health care costs
  • Guarantee choice of doctors and health plans
  • Invest in prevention and wellness
  • Improve patient safety and quality of care
  • Assure affordable, quality health coverage for all Americans
  • Maintain coverage when you change or lose your job
  • End barriers to coverage for people with pre-existing medical conditions

These are the goals of health care reform. As congress works to sort out how to accomplish these goals, through various committees and bills, a lot of confusion has emerged and this uncertainty has provided an opening for politicians, lobbyists, and others who’d prefer the status quo in regard to health care to convert the uncertainty of the people into fear through the spreading of distortions about bills being considered and the goals of the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party.

The result of this fear campaign has been the rallying and expansion of so-called “tea baggers” who’ve been protesting against President Obama ever since his election and inauguration. Their energies have been precisely harnessed to fight against health reform by those who have the most to gain, even if those doing the protesting have the most to lose. Their talking points are carbon copies of the distortions and outright lies being spread by the likes of Sara Palin and Newt Gingrich.

Unfortunately, it’s a lot easier to drink the weak tea brewed by the “tea baggers” than to actually get the facts and enter into an intelligent debate over the complexities of health care reform. The problem is that their arguments are unsubstantive. While I am going to push for Obama’s guiding principles to be followed, I don’t see any reason to try to reconcile the various bills floating out there or argue one against another. The truth , and this is perhaps the most critical evidence against the “tea baggers”, is that it makes no sense to get emotional over legislation when it still doesn’t exist in a form worthy of a massive public debate.

The puppeteers behind the “tea baggers” are targeting health care for political gain. For them, it’s not about the millions without insurance or those who stand on the every edge of losing everything if ever confronted with an illness. They don’t care because they can afford not to care. The rest of us can’t afford to not care, including the “tea baggers”.

Related posts:

  1. Senate moves forward on health care reform debate
  2. Health Care Reform passes House of Representatives
  3. Health reform protestors don’t get memo, show up anyway
  4. Political Cowardice: Public Option Opt Out Option
  5. Little heat in the debate between Bouchard and Stolle



Tagged as:

Joel McDonald has been following Virginia politics since February 2008, starting with the Democratic Presidential Primary. Since then, he has been the primary new media contact for progressive district and statewide campaigns.
Email this author | All posts by Joel McDonald


2 Responses »

  1. It’s always been very interesting that as advanced as the USA is economically, their health care system, in terms of accessibility, is, and has been, deplorable. I reside in Canada for one-half the year. I would consider the healthcare system to be good to excellent. Our taxes pay for accessibility to an MD for each and every citizen and landed immigrant. Hospital emergency rooms tend to be overcrowded and that’s due to patients who take advantage and misuse the system. We currently appear to have no means to consider effective triage. Also, it’s difficult getting in to see certain specialists (waits of three-six months not unusual) and in scheduling non-urgent but medically necessary operations. Nonetheless, everyone eventually gets seen and medical personnel are topnotch.

    I have also been involved in the medical system in Israel. Access is universal, physicians are excellent and it’s efficiency is amazing. It’s so good that I waited one year for my Maccabi provider to allow me full access and subsequently underwent an operation there. Hospital care was excellent. As an aside, Israeli nurses are certainly tough but there’s no length they won’t go to to relieve one’s suffering. That’s how I learned the meaning of “Sabra”, prickly on the outside but tender on the inside. Aftercare was both attentive and effective.

  2. As well-intentioned as Obamacare proponents may be, there are some things that are assumed that simply shouldn’t be.

    1. There is no way we need to insure an additional 50 million people. Analysis of the proposals under consideration indicate that millions would be left uninsured anyway. And the number of people who should be considered for assistance is far less than 50 million.

    2. There is the assumption that health care reform must include everyone, when a large majority of citizens see no need to change their own coverage. It’s absurd to me to think we have to wreck the current system.

    3. It’s assumed that the profit motive is to blame for bad care and bad insurance. The profit motive is an incentive to excellence. Government care lacks this incentive and care suffers as a result.

    4. Apparently, Obama and Co. assume that personal liberty doesn’t matter, and given the opportunity, government should take every aspect of life under its direct control as much as possible. The American people are sick of over-regulation, socialism, nanny-state decrees, etc. The anger being expressed is widespread, real and justified. People don’t want any more socialism. There’s too much already.

    Thanks for a well-written article. The goals listed are worthy, but I don’t see that much of it could be achieved under Obamacare. Unfortunately, it is a partisan political issue, because the proposed solution involves a unacceptable (to many) change to America’s political system.

    I appreciate your thoughtful approach to this matter of health care. It’s something that’s not often strongly in evidence on either side of the issue. I disagree with the liberals’ approach largely because I don’t accept some of their premises, and I don’t accept socialism.

Leave a Reply